Wes Kelley

Again, I’m posting a brief assignment from my graduate studies. We were asked to comment on the Gettysburg Address. I hadn’t read it in some time. Its beauty really struck me. I thought I would post both the speech and my comments below.

Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.

But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate — we can not consecrate — we can not hallow — this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us — that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion — that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain — that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom — and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.

The Gettysburg Address is oratorical poetry. It is simultaneously a beautiful expression of English prose and a seminal statement of American governance. We are one country, made hallowed and significant by the sacrifices of the men who died to defend its principles.

Obviously, you cannot separate the speech’s content from its context. This speech was given as the tide of the war was turning. It was becoming apparent that the Union would stand. Therefore, Lincoln’s brief statement was an eloquent sigh; one that signified that the war would be won and the sacrifices of its brave soldiers were the reason for the Union’s survival.

It is beautiful because of its brevity and focus. Much like the old prayers written in prayer books used years ago. Each word was chosen carefully. Each word has a job to do. Like a piece of colored glass being placed in a stain-glass window. Each lovely on its own, but forming a composite of glory. Okay, maybe my oratory is getting a little too rich, but we are rarely given an opportunity to wax on about the beauty of language.

What is interesting is that a speech like this could still be delivered today. Its style is not bound to its time. Churchill could have given this speech, maybe even Reagan or Obama. You could not deliver a speech like this on the campaign trail, but standing at the gravesite of fallen soldiers, or at another suitably somber and substantial event, it would still blow our socks off. We need “plain talk” but we also need a little nobility of thought AND language every once in awhile.

It is nice to see some creativity still exists in the been-there-done-that music video business.  This video takes a simple concept and executes it well.  Granted, there is nothing new about stop motion (Peter Gabriel’s “Sledgehammer” is perhaps the best known example), but I really like this execution.  Oh yea, and the music is okay too.

[Via Leo Laporte]

In this video, Ira Glass, of This American Life fame, speaks about the creative process and our aspirations to create content that lives up to our own standards.  This is good stuff from the person who is this creative force behind the best produced show on radio.

[Via 43Folders]

It struck me recently that a plain truth about my job is the fact that nothing is created. Things are improved, straightened out, maybe developed, but nothing is actually made from scratch. Bureaucrats, and other “customer service” management types like me, get to rearrange the deck chairs, but we don’t get to build the ship.

For some, say accountants, this is exactly what they expected. They studied in school how to follow the accepted standard methods of this or that and doing the job well means processing the details. But for others, the burden of “tweaking” caught them by surprise. When starting down a new career path, even the most mundane product or service has a steep learning curve. However, once you round the bases a few times you pretty much learned how to play. A bureaucrat must be satisfied with mastering the fundamentals, not re-defining the game. They are the stewards of another’s creation.

Artist, engineers, builders, even programmers have the ability to make something out of nothing–or what was thought to be nothing. They have the freedom to explore, test and toss their creations into the trash. For others, there may be opportunities for creativity, but that is not the same as welding the raw power of creation. While bureaucrats lack the power to create, good ones have the ability to refine. However, stretching the boundaries by doing it better, cheaper, smarter, is not the same as defining what “it” is.

Sometimes I think it would be fun to write the rules for a new game even though I’m pretty good at tinkering with the tried and true. The challenge is to craft this desire to define instead of refine into something great.

Even in literature and art, no man who bothers about originality will ever be original: whereas if you simply try to tell the truth (without caring twopence how often it has been told before) you will, nine times out of ten, become original without ever having noticed it. 

Quote from C.S. Lewis