I won’t pretend to understand all the nuisances of the financial sector meltdown, but it is shocking to hear terms like “socialism” and its close cousin “nationalized” returning to polite and intelligent conversation. Jack Shedd pointed out this post from Willem Buiter of the Financial Times where he suggests that maybe we should stop kidding ourselves and just nationalize our banks (the FDIC, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac being part of the joke).
If financial behemoths like AIG are too large and/or too interconnected to fail but not too smart to get themselves into situations where they need to be bailed out, then what is the case for letting private firms engage in such kinds of activities in the first place?
There is a long-standing argument that there is no real case for private ownership of deposit-taking banking institutions, because these cannot exist safely without a deposit guarantee and/or lender of last resort facilities, that are ultimately underwritten by the taxpayer.
Alexander Hamilton created the first Bank of the United States to encourage financial stability, shore up our currency and develop a source of credit for our cash-starved country. Perhaps what was old will be new again. Sadly, it is hard in this circumstance to know what is the frying pan and what is the fire.